|
|
||
|
For your convenience, we have installed the link below to make donations to this website easier. Now you can utilize your PayPal account or your credit card. -------------- Our Primary Pages Sports
-----------
Click on the logo above to visit the website for Cornell Cooperative Extension of Schuyler County ----------
|
|
Column: State Senator Tom O'Mara "Changing Albany-driven energy policies the only way out"ALBANY, April 19, 2026 -- "The lights are on but nobody's home," the old saying goes, and it serves to capture what went on in the Senate Chamber late in the afternoon last Wednesday. The lights were on, legislation to provide New York's ratepayers immediate relief from escalating utility costs was ready for a vote, and for the second time this session, the Senate Democrat Majority wasn't home.
How important would that relief be to ratepayers at the moment? Consider the latest statewide poll from the Siena Research Institute, which found 75% of respondents reporting that the cost of utilities was having a "serious impact on their financial condition." Fifty-one percent say their bills for heating and electricity are unaffordable, with nearly 30 percent admitting that they have been forced to borrow money or take on debt to cover utility costs. It's startling. It should be a wake-up call to every legislator who might, somehow, still be on the fence about acting. And yet there we were in the Senate Chamber again last week with the lights on and no Democrats home. The legislation the Democrats rejected last Wednesday, which was offered as amendments on the floor by myself and my colleague, Senator Rob Rolison of the Hudson Valley, would have ensured that ratepayers, under constant fire from skyrocketing energy costs, could have a better shot at making ends meet, balancing their family budgets, and keeping more of their hard-earned money in their own pockets. Instead, for the second time this session, Senate Democrats struck down proposals that would: --under legislation (S.8461) I sponsor, allow unspent funds, collected via surcharges on your monthly utility bill for the New York State Energy and Research Development Authority's (NYSERDA) "Climate Investment Account," to be returned directly to ratepayers. At a time when New Yorkers are having trouble paying their skyrocketing utility bills, there is nearly $3 billion that could be returned to ratepayers as a credit on utility bills; and --under legislation (S.8463) sponsored by Senator Rolison, which I co-sponsor, provide a one-year utility bill tax and surcharge holiday and two-year green energy tax holiday. Government taxes and fees account for between 25% to 50% of a customer's utility bill. The Senate and Assembly Republican Conferences have repeatedly offered these alternative policies that we believe are more focused on affordability, feasibility, and reliability. If enacted, we believe they would better protect ratepayers from the ever-rising costs they're struggling with now. It's irresponsible for New York State to go on asking ratepayers to bear the burden of a strategy that's not working and that won't work as it stands. Not long ago, for example, the Senate Republican Conference, in a letter to Governor Hochul, called for reconvening what's known as the "Climate Action Council" (CAC). We wrote, in part, "Since the passage of the CLCPA, electricity prices are up over 50% here in New York.This is not a coincidence. The mandates placed on utility companies have been borne by ratepayers ... These costs have become unbearable for our residents. State policy has driven up energy bills to the point where people are being forced to choose between keeping the lights on and affording everything else. It is time for the Council to reconvene and amend the CLCPA to account for economic realities." The CAC was created under the provisions of the "Climate Leadership and Community Protection Act of 2019," known as the CLCPA. It's a 22-member body appointed by the governor and both houses of the Legislature. In December 2022, the CAC approved a "Scoping Plan" that defined the specifics for implementing broad-based clean energy and climate goals and mandates. Plenty has changed over these past three years, however, and what we have learned, above all, is that the current strategy is delivering a heavy price tag for ratepayers, one that will only get heavier as time goes on unless we change course. Reconvening the CAC would give everyone the opportunity to get around the table again, honestly recognize what's not working, undertake a cost-benefit analysis which should have been done in the first place, and then develop an actual plan, not just a ban, to feasibly reduce emissions. In addition to calling for renewing the CAC, our Senate and Assembly minority conferences have advanced and will continue to promote actions to deliver much-needed relief to overburdened ratepayers. We will continue to voice a clean energy strategy that is focused on affordability, feasibility, and reliability. We have attempted to advance numerous alternative proposals, including those that were rejected again last week, and I fully expect that we will continue to do so throughout the remainder of the current legislative session. There's no choice. It's worth repeating, as often as needed: The only way to reduce energy costs in New York State is to change Albany Democrat-driven energy policies. Photo in text: State Senator Tom O'Mara
|
|
Charles Haeffner P.O. Box 365 Odessa, New York 14869
|
||